Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus; Alamo-Girl; tpaine; marron; unspun; restornu; xzins; lockeliberty
The alternative, which I support, is the consitutional remedy -- just take it away from the liberal judges. If they can't interpret the law without trying to legislate their own policy nostrums out of prejudice, then take the law away from them and leave them with an empty docket.

Sounds like really first-rate advice to me, lentulusgracchus!

It would have been nice to be spared the pain and expense of the amendment process; but increasingly the Left leaves the rest of us with little wiggle room to escape that seeming inevitability. If the people don't demand -- and get -- an acknowleddgement of their constitutional right to stipulate the answer to this question, then we can all just forget about living under a system of liberty and equal justice under law. It's that simple. IMHO. (FWIW)

222 posted on 03/06/2004 2:25:58 PM PST by betty boop (The purpose of marriage is to civilize men, protect women, and raise children. -- William Bennett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop
If the people don't demand -- and get -- an acknowleddgement of their constitutional right to stipulate the answer to this question, then we can all just forget about living under a system of liberty and equal justice under law. It's that simple. IMHO.

I agree! Thanks for the ping!

228 posted on 03/06/2004 8:24:12 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson