I am willing to bet money that, in the unlikely event this ever make it into the mainstream press, it will be brushed over with the ease Clinton shrugged of Gennifer Flowers in 1992.
Kerry's lapdogs in the press will pass it off as either (a)youthful indiscretions or (b)paint him as a traumatized victim whose environment in an immoral war forced him to act that way-- which is why he went overboard as Hanoi Jane's lapdog in denouncing the war after he was discharged. If forced to choose which, I'd pick (b) because it kills two birds with one stone.
I'd rather see Kerry being the nominee than that oleaginous John Edwards.
As hideous as that sounds, I agree. They're both nauseating creeps.