Skip to comments.
Powell Defends War, Says He Expected WMD [Powell Bashes Democrats!!!!]
Yahoo News ^
| February 11, 2004
| BARRY SCHWEID
Posted on 02/11/2004 3:55:02 PM PST by Howlin
WASHINGTON - Under attack by House Democrats, Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) said Wednesday he was surprised U.N. and American inspectors did not find storehouses of hidden weapons in Iraq (news - web sites).
But Powell told the International Relations Committee that "we presented what we believed the truth to be at the time."
Powell testified that President Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s apparent intent to develop and use weapons, his record of gassing his own people and his defiance of the United Nations (news - web sites) all were and remain valid reasons for going to war to overthrow him.
He said President Bush (news - web sites) and he had relied on intelligence provided by CIA (news - web sites) Director George Tenet, and the only serious question raised about the analysis since the war was whether Iraq had storehouses of weapons of mass destruction.
"I don't think anyone in America should think that President Bush cooked the books," Powell said.
"The reason we told you there were stockpiles there was because we believed it to be true," Powell said. "We were surprised when they did not turn up."
But Reps. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., Robert Melendez, D-N.J., Rep. Robert I Wexler, D-Fla., and Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, challenged Powell about the administration's case, suggesting it may have been misleading from the outset.
"Truth is the first casualty of war," Ackerman said. "I would contend truth was murdered before a shot was fired."
"We went into this war under false premises," Melendez said.
Wexler told Powell he considered him to be "the credible voice in the administration."
"When you reached the conclusion that Iraq represented a clear and present danger to the United States, that meant a lot to me," Wexler said. "But the facts suggest there was a part of the story that was not true."
Powell fielded the assertions calmly, defending the president's judgment and his own.
But when Brown contrasted Powell's military experience to Bush's record with the National Guard, saying the president "may have been AWOL" from duty, Powell exploded.
"First of all, Mr. Brown, I won't dignify your comments about the president because you don't know what you are talking about," Powell snapped.
"I'm sorry I don't know what you mean, Mr. Secretary," Brown replied.
"You made reference to the president," Powell shot back.
Brown then repeated his understanding that Bush may have been AWOL from guard duty.
"Mr. Brown, let's not go there," Powell retorted. "Let's not go there in this hearing. If you want to have a political fight on this matter, that is very controversial, and I think it is being dealt with by the White House, fine, but let's not go there."
Powell then went on to defend the Bush administration's assertions on Iraq's prewar weaponry. "We didn't make it up," Powell said. "It was information that reflected the views of analysts in all the various agencies."
But the dispute with Brown did not end.
"Are you shaking your head for something, young man?," Powell asked when he noticed an aide to Brown apparently disagreeing.
"I seldom come to a meeting when I'm talking to a congressman and I have people aligned behind you giving editorial comment by headshakes," Powell said.
Brown, defending his assistant, said "I think people have opinions."
Eager to move on, the committee chairman, Rep. Henry Hyde, R-Ill., observed that "we're on a very emotional subject," but "we've been doing swimmingly until now."
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: awol; henryhyde; powell; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-143 next last
To: Howlin
Scum is scum. Until the republicans start blasting Kerry over his anti-military behavior after Vietnam, they will continue giving this story legs.
To: Howlin
You just know Colin Powell is one angry man when he hears Kerry night after night holding up his military service as some sort of leadership credential while questioning the integrity of the Bush administration. Colin Powell spent years in the military dealing with the fallout of political opportunists like Kerry and his fellow Democrats. I'm quite certain that Secretary Powell has a lot of pent up anger, questioning his or the President's honor or acting like a snot-nose kid is not well advised.
122
posted on
02/11/2004 7:37:16 PM PST
by
Dolphy
To: Howlin
This is what I've been waiting years for-someone to forcefully defend the President and put the rats in their places. Every Republican official should be doing this 24/7.
123
posted on
02/11/2004 10:16:27 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(http://www.michaelmoore.com = miserable failure)
To: Jeff Chandler
Exactly. Powell was awesome today. It was like getting beat up by the neighborhood bully and having your dad pull up in the SUV.
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
It was like getting beat up by the neighborhood bully and having your dad pull up in the SUV. My dad was a 6-4, 250lb ex-WWII Third Infantry commando, ex-street thug, judo instructor. When he pulled up, the bullies and THEIR dads scrammed. (We never talked back, either.)
125
posted on
02/11/2004 11:01:49 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(http://www.michaelmoore.com = miserable failure)
To: Howlin
The media did the same thing with the screaming Gore speech .. CNN ABC and I think CBS totally ignored it.
126
posted on
02/11/2004 11:24:56 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: altura
Even the lovely and gracious Mara Liaison agreed that it was a mistake to bring that up to PowellWell. I wouldn't quite call her that but I did a double take when I heard her say it.
I'm not a big Powell supporter but I couldn't believe what he said. He was furious.
127
posted on
02/11/2004 11:25:05 PM PST
by
barker
(Bush/Cheney '04)
To: McGavin999
I agree .. and I hope we see more of it!!
128
posted on
02/11/2004 11:29:58 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Howlin
Powell should have gotten up and throughly THRASED Brown!
129
posted on
02/11/2004 11:31:20 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(Democrats are just not capable of defending our nation's security. It's that simple!)
To: Porterville
"The dems will be in the corner by Friday cowering in fear"
ROTFLOL!! I love it!!
Just a side note .. I have noticed lately that Shep on Fox has been using the term "dems". I think it's funny because that's the same term we use here. Hmmmm? Shep must lurk here a lot.
130
posted on
02/11/2004 11:42:57 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Becki
Bingo!! Dems have no respect. That's is one of their basic problems.
131
posted on
02/11/2004 11:44:01 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: A Citizen Reporter
These people are just more of the Clintons' goons .. trying to make points with the DNC so they will get finances for their next campaign. That's how it works!!
132
posted on
02/11/2004 11:49:35 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Peach
And .. Dick Morris is an idiot! So far I believe he's been right -0- times!
133
posted on
02/11/2004 11:59:24 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Jeff Chandler
LOL - nobody ever messed with my dad, either. He wasn't big, but he was scrappy and he wasn't afraid of anyone. Here's to having real men for dads. : )
To: cyncooper
I don't see a problem with that link. Didn't Halliburton build the original oil refinery in Iraq? Wasn't that why the Bush admin hired them to repair it .. because they had the original drawings for the plant?
135
posted on
02/12/2004 12:09:13 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
The old man taught me how to be a man. I owe him a lot, and not just the cash for the down payment on my first home!
136
posted on
02/12/2004 12:15:07 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(http://www.michaelmoore.com = miserable failure)
To: cyncooper
Is this what they're trying to get at - who served and who didn't. Rush was talking about this too. He thinks they're trying to establish a fact that not serving in the regular military should disqualify you to be President.
ROTFLOL!! FDR and Truman never served either, but they surely did a good job with WWII; of course, they had a repub by the name of Eisenhower who helped out a bit.
137
posted on
02/12/2004 12:19:13 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: daybreakcoming
Excuse me .. the RNC has been doing a great job.
138
posted on
02/12/2004 12:19:58 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: daybreakcoming
Done!!
139
posted on
02/12/2004 12:33:44 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Mo1
As for the intell ... it's the same flipping intell they rec'd when Congress voted for the warExactly. They ALL saw it themselves; they were ALL free to interpret it themselves.
And John Kerry himself was on the INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE for six years; where the hell was HE while the intelligence community was going to hell, as he claims? Can we lay the fault of that at HIS feet???????
140
posted on
02/12/2004 4:36:17 AM PST
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-143 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson