To: cripplecreek
I think this is a different level of security than for the primary contests.
4 posted on
02/11/2004 11:34:50 AM PST by
irgn
To: irgn
I've searched the linked page twice and see no mention of security for Kerry.
Trolling?
12 posted on
02/11/2004 11:37:31 AM PST by
EggsAckley
(..................**AMEND** the Fourteenth Amendment......(There, is THAT better?).................)
To: irgn
There was NO visible security when we went to one of his campaign stops. There was a cordoned off area for the press and folks with IDs. We walked right through them. Granted, we didn't look threatening. (we had five young children with us.) However, we weren't the only ones who moved freely during this "No more Bush" rally. Hubby remarked that tight security gives folks a feeling that they are around someone important. It makes a Kerry-type seem more presidential. As much as I enjoy Kerry's less than presidential appearance, I think it is wise that he have tighter security. If he and his handlers are so uncaring today about his security, how would they be with our national security???????
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson