To: iceskater
But, we've digressed from the point a bit. I think it's unrealistic for the Dems or anyone else to draw any vast conclusions from a primary where 10% or less of the eligible voters actually voted. The was the first binding primary in Virginia in a looooong time. You would've thought the dems would have gotten out the vote better. Agreed.
410 posted on
02/11/2004 9:17:18 AM PST by
Coop
("Hero" is the last four-letter word I'd use to describe John Kerry.)
To: Coop; iceskater
"But, we've digressed from the point a bit. I think it's unrealistic for the Dems or anyone else to draw any vast conclusions from a primary where 10% or less of the eligible voters actually voted. The was the first binding primary in Virginia in a looooong time. You would've thought the dems would have gotten out the vote better."
If you extrapolate the numbers, very roughly, across the states you will see that the dem candidate is being decided by about 10% of the eligible dem voters. That would mean 10M people deciding the candidate for 100M people. I was hoping this would lead to a Dean nomination!
452 posted on
02/11/2004 10:17:05 AM PST by
CSM
(My Senator is so stupid he'd have to get naked to count to 21 and my Governor wouldn't be able to!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson