Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ambrose
Saletan understands what should be obvious but isn't to many on the left and the right:

How well has Kerry done among these voters? In absolute terms, well enough. But in relative terms, the numbers show a disconcerting pattern. By and large, the closer you move to the center and center-right of the electorate, where the presidential race will probably be decided, the worse Kerry does. The opposite is true of Edwards...

If I were a Kerry believer, I'd make three arguments against this analysis. The first is that Kerry's higher score among liberals shows strength on the left rather than weakness in the center. But unless you think liberals wouldn't vote for Edwards against Bush, it's logical to assume that Edwards, as the nominee, would end up matching Kerry's strength on the left. Building support in the center is a lot harder...

Could I be wrong about all this? Sure. We pundits have been wrong before. Punditry is a dangerous game. But according to the exit polls, that's exactly the game Democratic voters have played in nominating Kerry. And if they're as shaky at it as we are, the price isn't just embarrassment. It's defeat.

4 posted on 02/11/2004 3:43:56 AM PST by dirtboy (We have come here not to insult Howard Dean, but to bury him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Edwards was always the most dangerous dwarf running insofar as W's re-election is concerned..

Southern, good looking, perceived as moderate, and a friendly and even sunny personality. Reminds me a bit of Slick Willard.

6 posted on 02/11/2004 3:55:30 AM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson