Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army to begin force stabilization in States
Stars & Stripes ^ | 10 Feb 04 | Lisa Burgess

Posted on 02/10/2004 6:52:14 PM PST by xzins

ARLINGTON, Va. — Beginning in September, the Army each month will designate one U.S.-based brigade as a “force stabilized” unit that will arrive, train and fight as a unit for three years before turning over as a group.

At the same time, the service will begin a “home basing” approach, which will keep junior soldiers at one installation for six to seven years — well beyond the current three-year average, according to Brig. Gen. Sean Byrne, the Army’s director of military personnel policy.

Force stabilization, as the initiative is known, is supposed to foster “increased readiness and stability for the fighting force, and predictability for families,” Byrne told Pentagon reporters Monday.

The initiative has two parts: home basing and unit-focused stability, Byrne said.

Under home basing, when soldiers join the Army, they will be assigned a home base where they will stay at least through the time they earn the position of squad leader, for enlisted soldiers; or of company commander, for officers, Byrne said.

Even when it comes time for a soldier to attend a leader development school, such as the basic noncommissioned officer’s course, the soldier will attend the class on temporary travel status (TDY), instead of uprooting himself and his family in a permanent change of station move, Byrne said.

Only after a soldier is leader-qualified — at about the six- or seven-year mark, Byrne said — will that soldier be considered for an assignment at a different installation.

Home basing will not have an effect on Europe-based soldiers “for the time being,” Byrne said. “There will still be an element going over for three-year tours, and we’ll still be doing individual assignments to [Europe] locations.”

Nor will there be a change for Korea, where the Army will continue its current practice of rotating troops in for one-year assignments, he said.

However, Korea will be treated “more like a deployment,” in that once the one-year tour is complete, the soldier will return to his or her home-base installation, where the family remained, Byrne said.

Under the unit-focused stability part of the initiative, soldiers will stay in the same unit, as a group through a 36-month cycle, Byrne said, rather than moving in and out using the Army’s current individual replacement system.

After soldiers arrive at a unit, which will be called the “reset period,” they will go through a six-month training period.

Then for the next 30 months, the unit will be considered “in a high state of readiness,” Byrne said.

Army plans also call for soldiers to go through “one operational deployment of six months to one year” during that 30-month “ready” period, Byrne said.

The force stabilization concept is especially timely, Byrne said, because of Army Chief of Staff Gen. Peter Schoomaker’s recent decision to center itself around highly capable, enhanced brigades, rather than larger, more cumbersome divisions, as its central combat maneuver unit.

The Army currently has 33 brigades, but Schoomaker has said he wants that number to increase to at least 43, or even 48, depending on funding. So at a pace of one brigade per month, it will take the Army about three years to complete the transition to the force stabilization model, Byrne said.


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; brigade; cohort; force; oif2; stabilization; stabilizationforce

1 posted on 02/10/2004 6:52:17 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; Jessamine; ...
Under the unit-focused stability part of the initiative, soldiers will stay in the same unit, as a group through a 36-month cycle, Byrne said, rather than moving in and out using the Army’s current individual replacement system.

Responding to a new threat PING

2 posted on 02/10/2004 6:54:26 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf; U S Army EOD; Darksheare; HiJinx
PING
3 posted on 02/10/2004 6:56:42 PM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins
This was tried in the 70's and was called COHORT, from basic to the end of enlistment.

Never heard how it turned out

4 posted on 02/10/2004 7:01:46 PM PST by dts32041 ("First, what is it you want us to pay taxes for? Tell me what I get and perhaps I'll buy it." RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
About time.
5 posted on 02/10/2004 7:03:40 PM PST by SAMWolf (Circular Definition: see Definition, Circular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
You are correct. They ended it. I think because of problems with personnel manning, career movement needs, and promotion needs.

Be interesting to see how this works out.
6 posted on 02/10/2004 7:05:12 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I believe it was also tried with the Regimental system in the eighties, could be wrong, but still don't how that turned out.
7 posted on 02/10/2004 7:07:24 PM PST by dts32041 ("First, what is it you want us to pay taxes for? Tell me what I get and perhaps I'll buy it." RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Bump!
8 posted on 02/10/2004 7:30:32 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I'm not an expert.

I am only a former honorably discharged Marine from Texas(never been to Alabama, but I hear it's a nice place).

With that said, I'm not sure I agree with this approach, although I understand the intent.

I would be more tolerant of this idea if we had a conscript army and soldiers only had a short stint of time of active duty.

Why am I concerned?

Notice the way I said that I was from Texas? Units at one time were known by their state designation. (the fighting Alabama 29th Infantry comes to mind)

I'm just not convinced that it's needed, or wise. As that old saying goes, "there is nothing new under the sun."

I only pray that American professional soldiers stay knife sharp.
9 posted on 02/10/2004 7:43:45 PM PST by PokeyJoe (Uncle Sams Motorcycle Club Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Any info on how the Guard is going to function? Stand alone or augment new brigade concept or?
10 posted on 02/10/2004 9:40:56 PM PST by petertare (truth, justice and the American way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: petertare
The guard has already gone through a reconfiguration, as I understand it, into eSB (enhanced separate brigades.) The new eSB's are supposed to be totally self-sufficient fighting brigades.

Guard units, by the very nature of their being from specific geographic locations, are already cohort.

There is very little movement of soldiers between guard units.
11 posted on 02/10/2004 9:45:05 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Bump!
12 posted on 02/10/2004 10:33:13 PM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson