Replies

The 60's radicals are aging (as are we all). Most are in their late 50's and older. Time is running out on them. If Kerry can be defeated, he may well be the last of those radicals ever to run for president. Electing one, Bill Clinton, was one too many, in my opinion.

One of my big frustrations with the current political scene is how Bill Clinton has escaped any blame for 9/11. Yet as sure as night follows day, 9/11 resulted from Clinton's monumentally weak, negligent foreign policy. GWB gets to carry all the burdens, and suffer the slings and arrows of all the second-guessing. And Clinton gets a pass.

Typical of the 60's radicals. They created havoc and left a torn nation in their wake, but never accepted the blame or responsibility for their actions. In my view, a President Kerry would be far worse than Bill Clinton, because Kerry is a true ideologue, whereas Clinton was just a cunning good-time Charlie who made it big.

...The 60's radicals are aging (as are we all). Most are in their late 50's and older. Time is running out on them. If Kerry can be defeated, he may well be the last of those radicals ever to run for president...

From your fingers to God's ears!

Thank you and Mr. Gannon for your concise language.

IMO, one of the reasons that the President OK'd the investigation of intelligence failures was to get the fact that the problems were the result of xlinton policy made public without having to say it himself.

He has spent his entire first term cleaning up the messes that x42 left behind, and has done admirably at that.

But, I come from a spiritual perspective, and know that they will all be held accountable for what they did to this country in the end.........

They aren't really going to get away with anything.