[Pan_Yans Wife]

It gets even more interesting when you remember that the client is a former stockbroker, herself.

[Always Right]

It gets even more interesting when you remember that the client is a former stockbroker, herself.

That still doesn't change the basic facts that the Broker is releasing inside information to his client. In a way this is like an entrapment. Martha did not request the information or seek to break the law, but was acting on information given to her by a licence Broker. To me it is the Broker who should be up on charges, but the broker is not the Billion dollar celebrity.

[drypowder]

It's called "complicit in a fraudulent act," the law includes all who acted. Kind of like the driver of the getaway car in a bank robbery.