Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson; yonif; Alouette

You have to wonder if Sharon proposed it, knowing that the Americans would oppose it, and put the US into the position of defending the "occupation" to avoid interecine Palestinian fighting, whereas previously the US made statements that the 'settlements have to go.' The US supporting maintaining the settlements obviously eliminates US pressure on Israel to eliminate them. Sharon might have bet that the US doesn't really want the side effects of the policy it hoped to see implemented.

Or, it could have been a happy accident for him.

Your take? Arik is wiley, but is he this wiley?
3 posted on 02/10/2004 11:34:54 AM PST by adam_az (Be vewy vewy qwiet, I'm hunting weftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: adam_az
Very thoughtful analysis. I also wonder whether ultimately it would be better for Israel to have the PA (a disguised terrorist organization) in charge of Palestinian arab areas versus Hamas (an unreconstructed terrorist organization). If Hamas openly controlled the Gaza Strip, in my view that would significantly lessen international pressure on Israel to make further concessions to arab terrorists.
14 posted on 02/10/2004 12:50:36 PM PST by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson