Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
What I say to it is...

It is a time-honored tactic of grossly overestimating the capability of your bogeyman in order to secure compliance from the populace for doing what you want to do anyway.

At some point, Saddam had chem/bio weapons. Most of what he had was crude, and his delivery systems were not very effective unless you were in a Kurd village or massed Iranian troops. There are model airplane enthusiasts who can build something more sophisticated that his "drones."

The question is whether the terrorists on 9/11 succeeded beyond their wildest expectations, or whether is was the tip of the iceberg. I tend to believe the former. And if you believe the former, the perpetual war on terror can easily be seen as the best excuse ever devised for a government power grab.

Nomex on.

39 posted on 02/10/2004 7:34:42 AM PST by lugsoul (And I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
"It is a time-honored tactic of grossly overestimating the capability of your bogeyman in order to secure compliance from the populace for doing what you want to do anyway."

And if they grossly underestimate? How long would the firestorm last?

"At some point, Saddam had chem/bio weapons. Most of what he had was crude, and his delivery systems were not very effective unless you were in a Kurd village or massed Iranian troops. There are model airplane enthusiasts who can build something more sophisticated that his "drones."

Does not a city make a good target for a crude delivery system?
42 posted on 02/10/2004 7:44:52 AM PST by Broadside Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson