[motzman]

Mansoor also said in mid-December that by the State of the Union address, we'd have evidence of wmd's in Iraq.
~Endeavor

He cries wolf a lot, but I haven't seen no steenkin' wolf.
~Dog Gone

There's a reason why we "haven't seen" the evidence.

Strategery

Once Kerry starts echoing the screaming Gore, but not before, will the real salvos start. There will be a "paradigm shift" (henceforth to be known as a "Paridigum Shift") in the WOT/Iraq and the opposition research attacks on Kerry will be devastating. My main concern is that Bush waits for the right timing; he's doing a good job of it now.

Notice the "emboldenment" of the Rat attacks after the "weak" MTP performance.

Drawing them in...

Just like we're drawing in the terrorists....

Strategery. Keep the faith.

[Dog Gone]

I don't really buy that. While I hope the WMDs are discovered and revealed just prior to the election, it would really be out of character for President Bush to conceal their discovery for political reasons. That's just not his nature.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

There is a lot of stuff that seems like is about to be disclosed... Generals smiling....guests on talk shows making statements...I don't understand why no one has mentioned a segment I saw Sunday on Fox with John Loftus regarding the nuke network talking about nukes and china and disagreements between DIA and CIA, etc... Said CIA does not believe WMD's are hidden in the Bakaa Valley of Syria and DIA saying they are... I wan't sure that he was believable...

[mabelkitty]

I'm with you.
I've seen this for three years now.
And they fall for it each and every time.
The most noticeable change was Rumsfeld, Kay, Bush, etc., telling the world we expected to find WMDs in Iraq, but we don't know if we will find WMDs in Iraq.

They never said we wouldn't find them - just that we wouldn't find them in Iraq. I find it hard to believe that Saddam didn't bite buy them. I bet he did. Perhaps he's even singing now.