Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Weird.
But cool.

But I want a few of those new odd 249's.
34 posted on 02/09/2004 3:56:49 PM PST by Darksheare (The SCARES will haunt the mind, eventually inducing derangement and senility!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare
But I want a few of those new odd 249's.

You'll have to give up to get: the ability to use the M16 magazine is lost, pretty well neglected or abandoned by most M249/Minimi users anyway. And the Mark 48 weighs in at 8.2 kg, a bit heavier than the 7 kg of the M249 [depending on model/configuration] or the 5.75 kg of the Navy Mark 46 Mod 0 Special Warfare lightweight 5.56mm SAW, which also deletes the magazine-feed capability as means to achieve weight reduction, but adds multiple Rail Interface mounts for scopes, laser targeting *killdots* thermal viewers and other useful accessories- some of them heavier than the gun.

The real question will be what comes of the proposed 6,8mm ammunition developments, particularly as they relate to the XM-8 rifle. Changes to the M249 to accomodate the new round should require little more than a bolt and barrel change, with a new link to replace the 5,56mm version probable, and possibly requiring some new components in the top cover/feed tray assembly. But we shall see.


42 posted on 02/09/2004 4:29:19 PM PST by archy (I was told we'd cruise the seas for American gold. We'd fire no guns-shed no tears....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson