Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FREEP THIS POLL: Who Do You Support in California U.S. Senate Race?
KSFO AM 560 San Francisco ^ | 02/09/2004 | Melanie Morgan

Posted on 02/09/2004 12:22:01 PM PST by Impeach98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Impeach98
Well Kaloogian is certainly the best candidate of the four.

PS: How is the Save Prop 187 initiative going? Do the organizer's think they can make the April Deadline?

Thanks.
41 posted on 02/09/2004 1:03:03 PM PST by Pubbie (I hate both the NeoConservatives and the PaleoConservatives - What does that make me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
I kinda got bored of that watching Dick and Simon squash him back in '02. More pathetic than anything else.
42 posted on 02/09/2004 1:06:09 PM PST by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
A POLL BY MELANIE MORGAN...

Who do you support to defeat Senator Barbara Boxer?

Bill Jones, former Secretary of State                     23%

Howard Kaloogian, Chairman Recall Gray Davis Committee    65%

Rosario Marin, former U.S. Treasurer                       7%

Toni Casey, former Los Altos Hills Mayor                   5%

43 posted on 02/09/2004 1:09:24 PM PST by calcowgirl (No on Propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
I'm unmarried at 38. Wanna challenge my "conservative Republican" credentials?

Were you were so running for office, I'd like to know why you're not married.

Thanks.

44 posted on 02/09/2004 1:15:49 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
That's an assumption. I try not to make them, especially as evaluating candidates.
45 posted on 02/09/2004 1:18:08 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Were you were so running for office, I'd like to know why you're not married.

WHY? What the hell business is it of yours? What sort of excuse or reason does he have to give to make himself acceptable in your eyes?

46 posted on 02/09/2004 1:18:26 PM PST by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Why is this "conservative Republican" still unmarried at 44?

Isn't being a conservative Republican in Kaliforinia one step below being a leper?

47 posted on 02/09/2004 1:19:10 PM PST by Gil4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
It's one factor.
48 posted on 02/09/2004 1:20:24 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
I'm not running for office but I'll answer anyway.

I haven't found a woman who wanted to marry me, though most women say I'd be a great catch for somebody else. Simple as that. California's funny like that.

And just because somebody is married doesn't necessarily mean anything whatsoever. Case in point: The Clintons.

49 posted on 02/09/2004 1:20:59 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture (Who wants to be the bug to my windshield?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
I guess he wants my vote. I think it's important. Thank you.
50 posted on 02/09/2004 1:21:38 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Last I heard they had done pretty well - gotten a couple hundred thousand signatures, but they are a bit stressed about how to reach a wider audience. The hard-core conservative types responded to Ron Prince's talk radio appearances, and the immigration reform groups got word out via email.

But since this is an all-volunteer effort they need to 'step it up' to get sufficient signatures.

51 posted on 02/09/2004 1:23:06 PM PST by Impeach98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
If Arnold is backing Jones, which he is, guess who will be running against Boxer.

Plus, Jones has been Secratary of State for 6 years and authored the 3-Strikes law. The only people who have ever heard of Kaloogian are KSFO listeners and a few folks here.

Are we gonna' get a repeat of the Campbell-Boxer race? Tom lost 48% - 43%, because "the perfect is the enemy of the good", and certain folks stayed home. Come on, tell me how we're better off with Boxer.

52 posted on 02/09/2004 1:25:59 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
"gotten a couple hundred thousand signatures, but they are a bit stressed about how to reach a wider audience."

If they have over 200,000 signatures then they should make the deadline with at least 800,000 signatures.
53 posted on 02/09/2004 1:26:23 PM PST by Pubbie (I hate both the NeoConservatives and the PaleoConservatives - What does that make me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Hmmm... I hoped Howard could break 70% - but I'm pleased with the results so far!
54 posted on 02/09/2004 1:27:29 PM PST by Impeach98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
Thanks.

I'm sorry to hear that. I hope you'll persevere.

I may yet vote for Kaloogian. But I'd like to know this about him. It seems odd to me. And odd to get so beaten-up on for merely bringing it up.

But that's okay. I work in a world of liberals, and I'm sortta used to it by now.

55 posted on 02/09/2004 1:28:13 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Hence the "if".

56 posted on 02/09/2004 1:28:33 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1
Already FReeped.

KSFO was instrumental in starting the recall.

Jones, no stones.

Kaloogian can beat the beach.
57 posted on 02/09/2004 1:28:33 PM PST by Carry_Okie (A faith in Justice, none in "fairness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
Are we gonna' get a repeat of the Campbell-Boxer race?

There never was a Campbell Boxer race. Campbell ran against Feinstein. Boxer first ran against Bruce Hirschenson, a conservative who lost by a scant margin subsequent to a last-minute dirty trick campaign. In 98 she defeated Matt Fong handily, so running a RINO against her didn't work.

58 posted on 02/09/2004 1:40:26 PM PST by Carry_Okie (A faith in Justice, none in "fairness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
I still enjoy this argument the best for "is Kaloogian the strongest challenger to Boxer?"

Matt Fong is a nice man. Just like Bill Jones. He was also MUCH more moderate than Bruce Herschensohn.

But people like to forget that Herschensohn did much better against Boxer than Fong.

Nominating a liberal or moderate GOPer is not a magical cure for victory. Ask Senator Seymour and Senator Campbell ;)

59 posted on 02/09/2004 1:55:07 PM PST by Impeach98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
And in 1992 that was the so-called "year of the woman" when George Herbert Walker Bush became a one-termer to Klintoon and yet Boxer just eeked out victory with a last-minute smear of Herschensohn.
60 posted on 02/09/2004 2:07:38 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture (Who wants to be the bug to my windshield?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson