Posted on 02/09/2004 9:14:40 AM PST by shrinkermd
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:51:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
In the spring of 2001, thimerosal (an ethylmercury-containing preservative) was removed from all routinely recommended vaccines given to young infants. As a consequence, lawsuits claiming that vaccines cause neurological damage, specifically autism, are now quietly amassing across the country. Soon, judges and jurors may decide whether thimerosal in vaccines caused harm.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Everyone in our business learns to take a punch, but even we've been surprised by the furious response to an editorial we ran a few weeks ago about vaccines. The subject deserves further attention, not least because the goal of our antagonists appears to be to shut down public debate on the matter.
For the past few years, a small coterie of parents has taken to loudly claiming that thimerosal, a preservative used in vaccines for 60 years, is the cause of autism in their children. Their allegations have scared many parents about immunizations, sent trial lawyers scurrying to sue the few remaining vaccine makers, and inspired an ugly political dispute. Lost in the controversy has been a little thing called science.
We felt someone ought to point out that nothing currently exists in the medical world to justify this furor -- that thimerosal has never been credibly linked to autism, and that recent studies in leading medical journals have also failed to find a link. That research is one of many reasons the medical community remains solid in its belief that vaccines are safe.
To our surprise, we had wandered into a hornet's nest of moral intimidation. In letters and e-mails we've since been accused of "fraud," a "terrorist act," and of having an "industry profit promoting agenda." We've been told we belong to a vast conspiracy -- including researchers, pediatricians, corporations, health officials and politicians -- devoted to poisoning their children. A few have harassed our secretaries and threatened an editorial writer.
As writers for an independent newspaper, we aren't about to shut up. But what worries us is that these activists are using the same tactics in an attempt to silence others with crucial roles in public health and scientific research. The campaign to silence or discredit them has already had damaging consequences.
A case in point is the National Alliance for Autism Research. This widely respected outfit was founded by parents of autistic children, and its staff and volunteers have raised millions for research. When the autism claims first surfaced, NAAR dutifully cofunded a Danish study, which found no connection between the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and autism. Within days, the critics were trashing NAAR, claiming it was under the influence of drug companies (untrue) and suggesting its research couldn't be trusted. NAAR had to spend valuable time and resources rebutting those claims so it can remain a source of honest information for worried parents.
Meanwhile, doctors who have spoken about the benefits of vaccination -- Paul Offit (who writes here) and Samuel Katz (the co-creator of the measles vaccine) -- have been targeted as baby killers and compared to Hitler. The goal appears to be to silence doctors who encourage immunizations.
That would be a disaster. While we don't know what causes autism, we do know that diseases like measles cause blindness and brain damage. Doctors are already struggling to be heard over Internet rumors, and they report that parents are increasingly nervous about vaccines. That's how paranoia started in England and Ireland, where parents were swept up in autism claims and refused to immunize. Ireland, a country with a population 77 times smaller than that of the U.S., reported 2,000 measles cases in 2002. The U.S. had 37.
As it happens, the thimerosal flap has already taken a human toll. Health officials recommended taking thimerosal out of vaccines in 1999 to help calm fears -- but this only fueled claims of a government cover-up. Worse, as Dr. Offit reported in a recent issue of Pediatrics, some hospitals misinterpreted thimerosal-related recommendations and suspended some vaccinations for newborns. One institution later reported the death, from acute hepatitis B-induced liver failure, of a three-month-old infant who wasn't immunized.
Aided by trial lawyers, the intimidation has spread to Congress. Vaccine makers receive some liability protection from the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program -- which pays out to the rare family whose child is injured by vaccines. But tort lawyers have exploited loopholes to file billion-dollar thimerosal suits that could bankrupt the few remaining vaccine makers.
When Republican Majority Leader Bill Frist tried to modernize VICP -- and require autism claims to go through the program like everyone else -- the autism police went to work. They camped out in Washington and convinced three Republican Senators to kill any liability protection. The Senators claimed in a recent letter to us that they hope the bill will be reconsidered, but it seems to have disappeared. The lawsuits go on.
None of this, we should stress, is in the interest of families struck with autism. Researchers have spent years studying the vaccine-autism link, and we hope they continue. But if the research disproves a connection -- as it has up to now -- the autism community needs to listen and move on. Research dollars are limited, and parents of autistic children deserve to see the money spent where it will do the most good.
Autism is a terrible diagnosis, and we hope science soon gives parents the chance at a cure. But the best way to achieve that goal is through open and honest inquiry that shouldn't be stopped because of the clamoring of an intolerant few.
Updated February 9, 2004 12:10 a.m.
As a side bonus, this practice would ensure that jury members will necessarily be able to, at least, read -- not at all the case today.
By mixing the two, it creates a confusion among jurors in a civil trial as to what their role is supposed to be. Even when, technically speaking, there are no punitive damages awarded, jurors still have a punitive mentality, and that needs to stop.
Republican Dan Burton is absolutely "on the warpath" on thimerisol.
Seems one of his grandkids was given some 10 doses of various vaccines at the same time to get him "caught up".
Within two days, he came down with Autism.
Gotta walk in someone else's Moccasins!
Someone should have him read the WSJ article. There is not a shred of evidence to back the claim that Thimersol causes autism. Also, Autism is not a disorder that suddenly begins in two days it is a pervasive and gradual disorder with most having an IQ. of forty or less. Finally, it is hard to imagine a baby receiving 10 vaccines at once or in a short time.
Polemics from professional Polemicists!
Actually, I cought the Hearing he chaired on C-SPAN...In this instance, the WSJ should be ashamed of itself!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.