[justshutupandtakeit]

Moby's intent was to do what YOU are doing - undermine Bush.
MY intent is just the opposite - to support Bush.

How can you attack me for supporting Bush and claim that I am doing what Moby wants- undermine him. That stretch of logic is wild even for a loose cannon.

[freeeee]

Moby's intent was to do what YOU are doing - undermine Bush. MY intent is just the opposite - to support Bush.

I think this statement cuts to the core of the issue.

You want to support Bush.

Others want to support liberty and the Constitution. They don't care about one man or his career.

If supporting Bush upholds liberty, they'll support Bush. Otherwise they won't. It's entirely up to Bush whether he wants further the cause of liberty, and earn their support.

Of course now comes "do you want Kerry/Hillary???"

Remember, some don't care who gets to wear the big hat. All they care for is liberty. If a rat administration leads to obstuction/gridlock, and that somewhat helps liberty, the answer is evident. If a rat win teaches the RNC a lesson and further down the road that leads to RNC nominating candidates that help liberty, again the answer is evident.

And yes, I'm fully aware of this site's new policy on what I just said. They can ban me if they like.

[looscnnn]

"Moby's intent was to do what YOU are doing - undermine Bush.
MY intent is just the opposite - to support Bush."

Are you really? Supporting Bush's stance that he will sign the AWB is not supporting Bush. If he signs it, that will cost him the election. So if you do support Bush, you would not defend signing it and would do all you could to make sure he does not.