[justshutupandtakeit]

I am not asking you to argue MY case just yours. Where is any evidence that those amendments have played any significant role in our legal history? I say they have not and if you want to dispute that then stop playing games and do so.

[tpaine]

justshutupandtakeit wrote:

"You will have never seen, nor will you ever see any statement by me that the Constitution is not relevent."

The reason the 9th and 10th have been ignored is because they are so vague as to be useless in legal terms.
They were a sop to the anti-federalists and no one expected that they would have any value other than to mollify opposition to the constitution.
362 posted on 02/10/2004 1:22:06 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit

______________________________________


Busted again in clearly stating the 9/10th are vague, irrelevent, & useless
-tpaine-

_____________________________________


Where is any evidence that those amendments have played any significant role in our legal history?
I say they have not and if you want to dispute that then stop playing games and do so.

---

You have clearly stated the 9th & 10th are vague, irrelevent, & useless.. And that:

"You will have never seen, nor will you ever see any statement by me that the Constitution is not relevent."

You first statement contradicts your other.