To: Charles Martel
"rather than the politically expedient thing."
The question that Bush needs to ask himself is which is the politally expedient way to go? Sign it and most likely loose more votes than he gains by signing it or not sign it and maybe loose a few votes because of other issues and not gain those for the ban, but keep those that would have left him if he signed.
490 posted on
02/11/2004 9:46:27 AM PST by
looscnnn
(Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
To: looscnnn
The question that Bush needs to ask himself is which is the politally expedient way to go? Sign it and most likely lose more votes than he gains by signing it or not sign it and maybe lose a few votes because of other issues and not gain those for the ban, but keep those that would have left him if he signed. Exactly. That this is even being considered for renewal is enough to make one want to beat knots on Rove's head. What the HELL is he thinking?!
503 posted on
02/11/2004 10:03:34 AM PST by
Charles Martel
(Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson