[spunkets]

"Congress is explicitly authorized to regulate "the manner of holding elections" and financial limits were upheld decades ago."

We went through that before. The manner of elections refers to mechanism and time, not to The amount, or content of political speech. That is true regardless of what the SCOTUS said. The financial limits are unconstitutional. Assaults on truth and decency are also not limited to rats.

[tpaine]

"We went through that before."
-spunkets-


______________________________________



We've ~ALL~ went through this before.

Our boy takes a goofy position, "to provoke discussion", [as he just admitted] and then glories in taking his defense to new, ever more 'provocative' heights of trollism..
Obviously, he craves the attention, even at the expense of his credibility.

- Weird fella.

[justshutupandtakeit]

Opinions on constitutionality are irrelevant unless they are from the USSC.

Assaults on truth and decency are almost a RAT monopoly.