To: tpaine
I have no objection to removing the rights of the criminal classes and other felons to owning guns. This is not an idea I try to hide.
363 posted on
02/10/2004 1:23:24 PM PST by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
To: justshutupandtakeit
justshutupandtakeit wrote: You will have never seen, nor will you ever see any statement by me that the Constitution is not relevent.
"Nor is there anything in the second amendment which prevent some laws wrt firearms being legitimate,"
-107-
_______________________________________
From # 107..
Hoisted on your own petard once again.
-- Please, continue to babble on, -- quibbling that you don't ~really~support the AWB, you just support the concept of -- "some laws wrt firearms being legitimate" -- & that its a 'right' of the president to sign it, -- or some such BS line of the day..
274 tpaine
_____________________________________
I have no objection to removing the rights of the criminal classes and other felons to owning guns. This is not an idea I try to hide.
363
Unresponsive to the charge that you support signing the renewal of the AWB.
381 posted on
02/10/2004 1:57:29 PM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
To: justshutupandtakeit
I have no objection to removing the rights of the criminal classes and other felons to owning guns. This is not an idea I try to hide. I would have absolutely no problem with denying RKBA to inmates in prison, and little problem with making temporary forfeiture of RKBA be a condition of parole, but to declare that a crime can be so heinous as to justify lifetime forfeiture of RKBA and yet so minor as to require zero prison time is just plain wrong.
393 posted on
02/10/2004 4:39:19 PM PST by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson