Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit
"States could and did infringe many, if not all, the rights mentioned in the BoR. Now they are applicable to the states."

Except that most states have constitutions with the 2nd added to them.

"Your view or my view of unconstitutionality are not the operative definitions of the term."

Really? To quote what has been asked many times before "what part of shall not infringe do you not understand"?
329 posted on 02/10/2004 11:44:54 AM PST by looscnnn (Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: looscnnn
My understanding is not the point since I do not get to impose it upon anyone. What is the point is the understanding of the various courts which deal with this question.
463 posted on 02/11/2004 8:53:47 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson