To: justshutupandtakeit
What you don't seem to understand is that death by one swing of the blade and death by multiple cuts of a smaller blade is still death. What you advocate is slow death by a hundred cuts instead of quick death by one huge cut. I want neither.
To: ought-six
No, I advocate actual hard work in educating the masses as to what these laws are and what they mean and how they don't work. This is FAR harder than just claiming something to be unconstitutional.
Not all hope is lost however, since the CC laws have spread across most of the states. As the truth about their relation to crime reduction and public safety spreads so will the inability to pass gun control laws.
The absolute WORST course is to attack those leaders on our side, like Bush.
130 posted on
02/09/2004 2:30:02 PM PST by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
To: ought-six
That analogy fails since one can survive a few cuts maybe even 50 or 75 but NOT the one fatal cut.
This law could be extended and later revoked. It would not be revoked EVER under a RAT president.
Those turning against Bush would ensure the second option.
This is what I am fighting against.
140 posted on
02/09/2004 2:51:30 PM PST by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson