[1stFreedom]

>>With all due respect to your opinion, most of those professionals (like myself) who will have their jobs outsourced are level-headed conservative voters who vote with their head, not their emotions like all the touchy-feely liberals.

I disagree. I've known tons of IT people who were left of left field.

>>It is almost an insult to say that such people will vote like an idiot liberal.

Maybe. But it may happen. If it doesn't happen, then what you might see is that the these people may just sit out the election.

>>I would far rather lose my job and have the discomfort of re-tooling than to put a liberal anti-American DemocRAT such as Kerry in the office of President

In General I would agree. However, for me, if Pres. Bush doesn't put up a fight over the courts, then it doesn't matter what big spender is in office. His tolken recess appoint isn't gonna fire up the base, IMO.

If we could bargain away our jobs to secure our future and to change the courts, yes it's worth it. However, no such bargain is being presented and it's wishful thinking on our parts to assume that our sacrafice will not be done in vain.


(not to mention the fact that Kerry is about as genuine as a 3 dollar bill).

Bush or his policies are not the blame for outsourcing. And I haven't seen anyone able yet to prove it.

[jstolarczyk]

"I would far rather lose my job and have the discomfort of re-tooling than to put a liberal anti-American DemocRAT such as Kerry in the office of President

In General I would agree. However, for me, if Pres. Bush doesn't put up a fight over the courts, then it doesn't matter what big spender is in office. His token recess appoint isn't gonna fire up the base, IMO.
"
Bush offered recess appoints to all the judges he has nominated, some refused. Bush has to hold back, he cannot fight all the judgeship battle and he knows he must be ready to fight for at least two Supreme Court Justices.