Replies

So write to the Bar and state your opinion that this is a fishing expedition.

The prosecutor is not keeping this case to typical user charges. This SA is on an obvious vendetta. NO USER CASE ever gets these resources or attention. NO USER case give immunity to blackmail. (which the prosecutor has not even investigated per his own offices admission)

This is not about drug charges, this matter is about the condct of this ELECTED LAWYER. A lawyer is is held to the standard of "the appearance of impropriety IS impropriety in and of itself.

You have a lawyer who is publicly lying about his communications with his boss the AG, you have a lawyer publicly lying about his conversation with the ethics hotline of the FL Bar.

Have you even read the actual ethics complaint?

Bill Clinton is gone, his ethics complaint was resolved with his disbarment. The ethics complaint against Clinton had nothing to do with the conduct of Star. Clinton's own conduct torpedoed his law license.

In this case the SA holds the priviledge of a law license in FL. His conduct has violated the ethics rules of the FL Bar. At the very least that merrits a public hearing by the people who issued his license to practice law.

A lawyer is is held to the standard of "the appearance of impropriety IS impropriety in and of itself.

Too bad Starr never realized that, as he kept dismissing all of the appearances of impropriety as nothing. Why do you keep going on about Clintong's wrongdoings? I'll never disagree with you that he was total sleaze, both personally and professionally.