Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
Wrong. Clinton IS a sleaze in everything he does.

Read again. I used a double negative = saying is a sleaze.

Bush has been honorable so far. Clinton was slime before he took the office.

Bush? We'll have to wait and see. He is a politician after all. Clinton? Wholehearted agreement here.

Post your info. Put up an article or link to what you have.

I was going off of memory, but a quick Google pulled up this, dating back to when GHW bush was president.

Clinton's dirt is written on a wide swath of paper and video. Only a knee-padder or a dolt would deny it.

Did I ever deny it? Attacking Starr is not the same thing as defending Clinton. In that case, as is likely in this one, neither have clean hands.

45 posted on 02/09/2004 12:16:48 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
In this case you have a prosecutor on a true fishing expedition when other similarly situated people are treated differently.

This is the situation of Rush Limbaugh's Attorney vs the CONDUCT OF AN ELECTED OFFICIAL WHO IS ALSO A LAWYER.

two differnt situations.
46 posted on 02/09/2004 1:04:18 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson