Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: seamole
lame. They only showed supporters. The reporter basically said it was inevitable the homosexual marriages would happen because the soonest a vote could happen is 2006. They also reported that the demands for a public vote would not guarantee passage of the constitutional amendment because the public is "divided".

It was tame, and not overly biased against. That may have had more to do with the freezing weather and the dearth of opposition to the supporters of traditional matter.

The emphasis was definitly on letting the public vote. A suprisingly unified portrayal.
30 posted on 02/08/2004 11:16:52 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson