To: swarthyguy
It picked up the Iraqi WMD "material" and brought it to Pakistan for safe custody on behalf of Iraq. It is not clear what did they mean by material---only documents or something more? Is the word "material" ever use to refer to "documents" in that context? It doesn't seem to me to be a very good fit, but then again I have no knowledge of their nomenclature.
89 posted on
02/10/2004 2:17:10 PM PST by
Don Joe
(I own my vote. It's for rent to the highest bidder, paid in adherence to the Constitution.)
To: Don Joe
I think they're hedging and don't want to go out on a limb. The whole thing is being orchestrated from DC and the Indians, IMO, have no desire to irritate Uncle Sam. "Materiel" would include non-documents.
If this tidbit makes the mainstream US press......
Of course, that leads to the question, where in Pakistan?
Are they part of their arsenal, or we don't know where they are. And could they have gone somewhere else from Pakistan......
93 posted on
02/10/2004 2:25:32 PM PST by
swarthyguy
(Russia doesn't conduct negotiations with terrorists -- it destroys them," Vlad Putin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson