To: oceanview
Al Gore was hardly an attractive candidate. And you are failing to explain why John Kerry seems to be the top choice among Democrats when his face looks like it is falling off. Definitely not an attractive man. Edwards is not the front runner. And whether I'm a Republican or not has absolutely nothing to do with it. I've been accused of supporting Bush because I have a crush on him. You are fooling yourself if you think anyone will win the support of females simply because he's "cute." I think John Edwards is cute but he's still a dumbass.
1,597 posted on
02/08/2004 8:02:14 PM PST by
ilovew
(In honor of Mike Adams, a high school classmate, who died in Iraq last summer.)
To: ilovew
my post was not directed at you personally, I don't know why you are getting so defensive.
the polls on the female demographic regarding this topic are quite clear. Kerry has already been botoxed, watch him get pec implants next. and Edwards is the likely VP, and if that turns out to be true, a large part of the calculation about putting him on the ticket will have to do with the female demographic, as much as his appeal in the south.
To: ilovew
You are fooling yourself if you think anyone will win the support of females simply because he's "cute." I think John Edwards is cute but he's still a dumbass.
>>>>>>>>>>>
actually as a woman I thought it was a funny remark, got a good giggle from it. Having said that it's not necessisarily 'cuteness' that the women he's talking about will vote for, but for whomever promises to best 'take care' of them.
that in my opinion is what democrat women seem to look for, and what alot of tenderhearted women who are independents look for, then there are those airheads who do actually look for the best rear end or cute face.
some women are sexist and do vote based on looks. (so many women seemed(and still do) to think the ex pres was/is good looking, I've never seen that myself)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson