Replies

It's always interesting to see how they spin things. being a Democrat means never having to take responsibility for anything you do nor be held accountable for your words or actions. That's how they can morph from one side of an issue, law or belief so easily and with no remorse.

These people view myself and other soldiers as more of a Peace Corps in camoflauge. Clintoon displayed that belief in all of the places he sent us that we should NOT have gone and by not using us when he SHOULD have.

And here's a question for everyone. Why is is that 12 years ago, the issue of a presidential candidate having served or not served in the military was "not important" and the Republicans were slammed for bringing this up about Clintoon. Even John F'n Kerry went to the Well in the Senateand railed about the Republicans "refighting the Vietnam War". Yet here we have a former Fighter Pilot in the Air National Guard serving rather successfully as not on the POTUS but aslo as CINC of the Armed Forces who are prosecuting a global war on terror and suddenly military service is important to the Dims. What changed?

What changed?Why,the dem candidate's military record,of course!.
I am more interested in his record after the war.I realize my disdain for his Jane Fonda period only resonates with some people,but his votes on the military funding,intelligence,taxes,etc will matter.He is a lefty liberal.

I DO NOT TRUST HIM!

President Bush looked tooo good landing on that carrier.

Actually, nothing has changed except they are out of power and they plan to get it back one way or another.

"HATE" they just plain "HATE" President Bush.

JFKerry can't exactly brag about his service after he received his medals. So he made an defensive move to muddy the water about what is known about himself, and while he was at it trying to make National Guard service look like nothing because that is where President Bush learned to fly.

They are trying to do to the military and the victory in Iraq equated same as Vietnam. Remember their complaints then well it is same tune played with different words 40 years later. Wonder who they will get this go round to come back and testify before Congress about the "evil" deeds of our military.

Their "band" the media loves this aspect of their plan, because they "HATE" President Bush just as much as anyone.

The way I see it is in some ways it boils down to a juvenile mentality. So much of the way liberals operate is reminiscent of the worst about one's years in high school.

One current example: The AP (or, for that matter, a great many among the print media) are like those snotty H.S. Yearbook editors who can decide to include 10 pictures of their cheerleaders, one awful, candid shot of someone they used to date and now can't stand, and a typographical error in another's name just to ruin that person's memories of high school even more.

The media are largely at fault for the military service being a supposed issue for voters. They brought it up with Dan Quayle, too, remember.

What changed?
****

The dims lost the White House!

The only principle that they have is that the power belongs to them. Everything else is secondary, even the fact that we have troops overseas in daily harm's way. They will say and DO anything to regain power. Contradicting their own words is not a problem to them.