It all comes down to interpretation of the supposed evidence. From my perspective I see no evolution taking place.
That was a very limited sample of what's out there in just the area of hominid evolution. By linking sites such as the one you linked in 159, you're telling people that there is no evidence from the fossil record to even consider. That's absurdly far from true. Flat-out false.
All you're really doing is refusing to make any inferences that work against you, a set which includes most of the Occam's-Razor straightforward inferences anyone would reasonably make from the data in biology, geology, and paleontology. That and you absurdly misrepresent how much evidence you're denying.