Misstating what I said, and making up strawmen arguments like you are "isn't a real intelligent analysis" either.
I'll mark you down as a person who feels that intergenerational wealth transfer is not socialism.
Besides the temporary token reduction in income taxes (recovered in other sectors by the raising of many fees and regulations - and don't forget the greatest hidden tax - inflation) what has Bush done that is not socialist or worse, globalist?
Warmoose: Misstating what I said, and making up strawmen arguments like you are "isn't a real intelligent analysis" either.
No, you brought up many problems with our country, i.e., federalized schooling, borders, language, culture breakdown, Medicare, etc. Bush didn't implement or cause any of them...as you well know. They have existed from long ago. Gray Davis, a Rat, is to blame for what's gone on in California, passing bills which give free tuition, for example, to illegal aliens. The liberal judges there overturning laws the people made about speaking English. But, you already knew that Bush had NOTHING to do with any of that.
I'll mark you down as a person who feels that intergenerational wealth transfer is not socialism.
Yes, please do that. Families who work hard to amass wealth are entitled to give it to whom they please. It's THEIRS, not mine and not the government's.
Besides the temporary token reduction in income taxes (recovered in other sectors by the raising of many fees and regulations - and don't forget the greatest hidden tax - inflation) what has Bush done that is not socialist or worse, globalist?
The income tax reduction was no "token." That was sound economics. He's wanting to get the death penalty tax rescinded, something that other Republicans have been trying to do for years, i.e., Scott McInnis of Colorado. He's been trying, for years, to get conservative judges on the bench, i.e., Estrada and Pickering, but the liberal socialist senators have refused to allow them be put to a vote by the full senate....and you know, Pickering was just recess-appointed.
You are aware that this country isn't run by a dictator, aren't you? That means that Bush cannot do anything as a ruler; Congress makes the laws; liberal judges have been making them from the bench, for years now, destroying our republic. Special interest groups and their money have enabled them to ruin many parts of our country where there are also liberal socialists, turning our forests into ridiculous protected areas, thereby resulting in infernos across the western landscape. I recall, finally, after the last burn-out in California that the Rat senators were finally forced to sign a bill that Bush had wanted signed since he took office.
There's also the matter of ANWR, but, again, the liberal socialist senators, i.e., Dashole, are obstructing this from happening; they think that demand should be reduced, not supply; so, they refuse to allow drilling in Alaska which would get us more independent from Saudi oil...another "little something" that Bush has been trying to get through.
I guess you've forgotten who to blame in your zeal of campaigning against the President.