Message to ?Conservatives

Vanity | Feb. 11, 2004 | Nix Two

[FairOpinion]

Apparently you haven't read my posts -- again.

[EternalVigilance]

It's simple. I just have to read the words.

No need for further discussion, it's right out there in the open for everyone to see.

You're such a nag.

[Nix 2]

Why, thank you for your patience and perserverence. I'm overjoyed you thought it was good enough to merit such a run. Facts is facts and that was a good point. It probably wouldn't have.

[EternalVigilance]

I've read all of your posts. It was tough, but I waded through it.

[Nix 2]

Wah! DW.

[dmzTahoe]

"Anybody know what post #64 was about? Did I miss something?"

It's a matter of time...when posters run out of intellectual arguments, they resort to either name calling or calling for help...watch, it'll happen (check out the other threads).

It is much easier for most (not pointing to you) to wish that those with dissenting opinions disappear or did not exist, rather than have to engage in an honest intellectual debate with an open-mind.

My two cents, FWIW.

And what's this "other country" stuff?

[FairOpinion]

Then your old comprehension problem is kicking up again, or never left -- I have posted a graphs, which factually proved Jorge right, in his statement about the deficit, as well as a few posts supporting him and warning him, that any discussion with you is a waste of time. Apparently you missed all that.

[dmzTahoe]

Sorry Nix 2, my itallics should have read : "Who threatened to call JimRob? Or the mods?"

It's late.

[EternalVigilance]

Well, what do you know? We agree on something!

But in fact, I agreed throughout the thread with some of the things you said. You didn't acknowledge that, or attempt to use it as bridge to a more adult exchange.

I said some nice things about you. You didn't acknowledge that.

That is the kind of incivility that we don't need...and why I think I hit the nail on the head by focusing on the tone and the target of what you wrote.

Aim your ire at Democrats. Go after liberals with all your might. Nobody in FReeperland is going to argue with you at all.

But when you focus your fire on conservatives who have legitimate beefs with policy, don't be surprised when someone calls you on it.

[EternalVigilance]

You are a dishonest poster, and I have no respect for anything you say.

[FairOpinion]

"I have no respect for anything you say."

==

Coming from you, I take that as a compliment.

Good night!

[EternalVigilance]

Bye bye!

[tgslTakoma]

A momentary change of subject...

With a cold today, I decided to rest and relax (read: stay offline). I watched a great (kids') movie, "Milo & Otis." Lots of puppies and kittens, Dudley Moore narrated it, all kinds of baby animals. It came out in '89 and my kids loved it when they were little; so much so that they wore out the videotape years ago. I found it on DVD at Best Buy today. Definitely of therapeutic value on days like today.

Now back to reading everybody's comments on this thread...

[Jorge]

Then your old comprehension problem is kicking up again, or never left -- I have posted a graphs, which factually proved Jorge right, in his statement about the deficit, as well as a few posts supporting him and warning him, that any discussion with you is a waste of time. Apparently you missed all that.

Let's face it. EV is a liar. He/She/It has no regard for the truth.

But I find destroying EV's flimsy arguments a form of FR message board entertainment.

[EternalVigilance]

Yeah right.

You're one of FR's resident liberals. Talk about entertainment value. That's the only reason you're kept around, you do know that, don't you?

[Jorge]

No need for further discussion, it's right out there in the open for everyone to see.

And everyone seems to disagree with you.

You're such a nag.

Maybe. But I'm YOUR nag. Admit it. You like me.

[EternalVigilance]

You haven't 'destroyed' a single one of my arguments. You're delusional.

[tgslTakoma]

Actually, they have asked for my help. :-)

If that statement is true, then I am really worried about the state of things around here.

Praying that it's not true...

[Texasforever]

You haven't 'destroyed' a single one of my arguments. You're delusional.

EV you got your head handed to you on this thread. Better luck next time.

[EternalVigilance]

No, I don't like you.

I haven't liked you since the first time I encountered you on FR...because you were advocating for the homosexual agenda.

Am I mistaken, or was that the first time we crossed paths?