Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Decides to Enter Fray on TV Show
AOL/New York Times ^ | Feb 6, 2004 | Richard W. Stevenson

Posted on 02/07/2004 2:29:28 PM PST by evad

WASHINGTON, Feb. 6 — With his poll numbers slipping and Democrats attacking him and his credibility over the failure so far to find any banned weapons in Iraq, President Bush has decided to strike back. He will throw his first punch in the rough and tumble of a ring familiar to all candidates for high office: a Sunday morning news show.

(Excerpt) Read more at aolsvc.news.aol.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; gwb2004; mtp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
For all of us FReepers who are anxious for our president to condradict the vicious lies of the left, here's a shot from W to appear on Meet the Press
1 posted on 02/07/2004 2:29:29 PM PST by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: evad
failure so far to find any banned weapons in Iraq

I guess the NY Times forgot about the long-range missile...?

2 posted on 02/07/2004 2:30:40 PM PST by Lunatic Fringe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
shucks...should be contradict.

Long time FReeper that doesn't do a lot of posting;-)

3 posted on 02/07/2004 2:31:12 PM PST by evad (There is only one Brit Hume)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
Actually, what will be very interesting is to see if Senator John F. Kerry will go on The O'Reilly Factor on Fox News Channel after Kerry (as it currently stands) gets the nomination. O'Reilly is going to rip him to pieces just on the gay marriage thing alone.
4 posted on 02/07/2004 2:36:22 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Well, this has been a learning experience. Embarrassing for someone that's been a FReeper for so long...BUT.. what's the rule if I get the story from AOL but they source the NY Times?

Do I still have to excerpt the article?

And yes, I now realize that the AOL link won't work.

5 posted on 02/07/2004 2:37:58 PM PST by evad (There is only one Brit Hume)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
Thank you for posting an unnecessarily excerpted article.

Especially since the article requires registration for those of us who are (thankfully) AOHELLless.

6 posted on 02/07/2004 2:41:36 PM PST by upchuck (Help Stop Animal Overpopulation - Spay/Neuter Your Pets and Any Weird Friends Too...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
The whole Iraq argument is wrongly framed.

The burden of proof re: WMD's was upon Iraq. The terms of GWI surrender were clearly stated.

Also, Saddam's support for terrorism is beyond debate - he bragged about his payoffs to the families of Palistinian homocide bombers.

7 posted on 02/07/2004 2:43:26 PM PST by StatesEnemy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Does it really matter what Saddam used to kill an estimated 2 million Iraqis and Iranians, Kuwatis with? I just come from the letters to the editor at the New York Times, incredible! You would think that people after 9-11, especially people from New York would realize we have to confront evil now. I believe he had WMD's, I believe there are WMD's hidden in Iraq and also sent along the well established smuggling route to Syria. These anti-Bush people are just willing to sacrifice the economy be encouraging to go bad to deat Bush. And they are also willing to encourage the enemy to attack our brave military by not supporting our President. Take the gloves off, President Bush, you tried being nice to these people, that only gets our young people killed and out of work, I can't wait until "Meet The Press"! I know at least someone at the White House is a Free Republic "lurker". Hi Karl!
8 posted on 02/07/2004 2:44:58 PM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
You're welcome
9 posted on 02/07/2004 2:46:08 PM PST by evad (There is only one Brit Hume)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
I've lost it for O'Reilly, I think the libs are getting to him.
10 posted on 02/07/2004 2:47:10 PM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: evad
NY Times is not on the excerpt list. LA Times is. You're not the only one who confuses it.
11 posted on 02/07/2004 2:47:43 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: evad
There is a column from the New York Times I want to post here and get some thoughts from others on. How do I do that without typing the whole column myself into the "article content" box?
12 posted on 02/07/2004 2:50:28 PM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
NY Times is not on the excerpt list. LA Times is. You're not the only one who confuses it.

Hey thanks..I'll do better next time.

As a matter of fact, I'll fix it now.

13 posted on 02/07/2004 2:50:46 PM PST by evad (There is only one Brit Hume)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon
Ehhh.... cut-n-paste?
14 posted on 02/07/2004 2:51:22 PM PST by StatesEnemy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: evad
Here's the article, straight from the NY Times.

Some of us have cojones and are not afraid to post the entire article.

WASHINGTON, Feb. 6 — With his poll numbers slipping and Democrats attacking him and his credibility over the failure so far to find any banned weapons in Iraq, President Bush has decided to strike back. He will throw his first punch in the rough and tumble of a ring familiar to all candidates for high office: a Sunday morning news show.

White House officials said the president had chosen to appear on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday to make a case that he has done well in handling the challenges of terrorism and a weak economy, and to bring the political debate back to the ground he wants to fight on.

"The president's very eager to go out and talk about his policies, the actions he's taken and why it's making the nation more secure," said Dan Bartlett, the White House communications director. "He's more than comfortable talking about those decisions and he believes the country wants to hear from the president about these issues."

But Republicans allied with Mr. Bush's re-election campaign said there was a heavy dose of politics behind the decision as well. As he faces intensifying pressure on weapons in Iraq, they said, it is more urgent that Mr. Bush go on the offensive. After saying for months that he was too busy dealing with the nation's business to descend into the partisan wars, Mr. Bush and his top advisers have concluded that the risk of remaining on the defensive outweighed the risk of dropping the pose that he was above politics and appearing on television in candidate mode, Republicans said.

Mr. Bartlett said Mr. Bush told him on Tuesday that he wanted to appear on "Meet the Press." Republican officials said Mr. Bush was eager to send a message that he is not afraid to take tough questions from the moderator, Tim Russert.

"He's been chomping at the bit for a while to get into the fray," said Charlie Black, a veteran Republican strategist who has close ties to the White House. "There's no better place to show you can answer the criticisms and put them behind you than on Russert."

Mr. Bartlett played down any suggestion that Mr. Russert presented Mr. Bush with a critical test. He said the president had requested some briefing material and had run over some likely questions with his senior staff on Friday afternoon, but otherwise was not engaging in any intensive preparations for the interview, which is to be taped at the White House on Saturday.

Mr. Bush's appearance will come after weeks of developments that, in the view of some Republicans, undermined the president's political strength and demanded an assertive effort by the White House to get back on track as the campaign heats up.

Mr. Bush's proposal for a return to the moon and a manned mission to Mars fell flat, they said. He got no bounce in the polls from his State of the Union address. He came under unusual criticism from economic conservatives in his own party over continued big increases in government spending and the rise in the budget deficit. Faced with a storm over the use of prewar intelligence about Iraq's weapons, Mr. Bush appointed a commission on Friday to study the issue, taking some of the gloss off the commander-in-chief persona that his political team had hoped to make central to his campaign.

At the same time, the Democrats began to coalesce around their front-runner, Senator John Kerry, allowing them to focus increasingly on attacking Mr. Bush rather than each other. With Mr. Kerry's emergence as the front-runner came another problem for the administration: the comparison, highlighted by Democrats, between Mr. Kerry's record as a Vietnam war hero and the questions about whether Mr. Bush fulfilled all his duties as a National Guard pilot in the same period.

"We always knew that as the Democratic race reached a peak it would focus coverage on the criticisms of the president," Mr. Black said. "At the same time, several other issues put the president on the defensive. It would have been smart strategy to go back on the offensive once the Democratic nominee emerged, but with these other things happening, the sooner the better."

Republicans involved with the Bush-Cheney campaign said the appearance on "Meet the Press" marked the start of a more aggressive phase of the campaign. The campaign's strategists are making final decisions on the shape and timing of an advertising campaign that will probably go on the air within weeks, Republican officials said.

Campaign officials said Mr. Bush's appearance on "Meet the Press" was not a sign of panic or of any change in basic strategy.

"We're 269 days from the election, and that's several political lifetimes," said Terry Holt, the Bush campaign's spokesman. "If you've heard anything from the Bush campaign over the past 10 months, it's been that we expect a close race, and that's still operative."


15 posted on 02/07/2004 2:52:21 PM PST by upchuck (Help Stop Animal Overpopulation - Spay/Neuter Your Pets and Any Weird Friends Too...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: StatesEnemy
Okay, I'll figure it out.
16 posted on 02/07/2004 2:52:27 PM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
WASHINGTON, Feb. 6 — With his poll numbers slipping and Democrats attacking him and his credibility over the failure so far to find any banned weapons in Iraq, President Bush has decided to strike back. He will throw his first punch in the rough and tumble of a ring familiar to all candidates for high office: a Sunday morning news show.

White House officials said the president had chosen to appear on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday to make a case that he has done well in handling the challenges of terrorism and a weak economy, and to bring the political debate back to the ground he wants to fight on.

"The president's very eager to go out and talk about his policies, the actions he's taken and why it's making the nation more secure," said Dan Bartlett, the White House communications director. "He's more than comfortable talking about those decisions and he believes the country wants to hear from the president about these issues."

But Republicans allied with Mr. Bush's re-election campaign said there was a heavy dose of politics behind the decision as well. As he faces intensifying pressure on weapons in Iraq, they said, it is more urgent that Mr. Bush go on the offensive. After saying for months that he was too busy dealing with the nation's business to descend into the partisan wars, Mr. Bush and his top advisers have concluded that the risk of remaining on the defensive outweighed the risk of dropping the pose that he was above politics and appearing on television in candidate mode, Republicans said.

Mr. Bartlett said Mr. Bush told him on Tuesday that he wanted to appear on "Meet the Press." Republican officials said Mr. Bush was eager to send a message that he is not afraid to take tough questions from the moderator, Tim Russert.

"He's been chomping at the bit for a while to get into the fray," said Charlie Black, a veteran Republican strategist who has close ties to the White House. "There's no better place to show you can answer the criticisms and put them behind you than on Russert."

Mr. Bartlett played down any suggestion that Mr. Russert presented Mr. Bush with a critical test. He said the president had requested some briefing material and had run over some likely questions with his senior staff on Friday afternoon, but otherwise was not engaging in any intensive preparations for the interview, which is to be taped at the White House on Saturday.

"He's been chomping at the bit for a while to get into the fray." -Charlie Black, Republican Strategist

Mr. Bush's appearance will come after weeks of developments that, in the view of some Republicans, undermined the president's political strength and demanded an assertive effort by the White House to get back on track as the campaign heats up.

Mr. Bush's proposal for a return to the moon and a manned mission to Mars fell flat, they said. He got no bounce in the polls from his State of the Union address. He came under unusual criticism from economic conservatives in his own party over continued big increases in government spending and the rise in the budget deficit. Faced with a storm over the use of prewar intelligence about Iraq's weapons, Mr. Bush appointed a commission on Friday to study the issue, taking some of the gloss off the commander-in-chief persona that his political team had hoped to make central to his campaign.

At the same time, the Democrats began to coalesce around their front-runner, Senator John Kerry, allowing them to focus increasingly on attacking Mr. Bush rather than each other. With Mr. Kerry's emergence as the front-runner came another problem for the administration: the comparison, highlighted by Democrats, between Mr. Kerry's record as a Vietnam war hero and the questions about whether Mr. Bush fulfilled all his duties as a National Guard pilot in the same period.

"We always knew that as the Democratic race reached a peak it would focus coverage on the criticisms of the president," Mr. Black said. "At the same time, several other issues put the president on the defensive. It would have been smart strategy to go back on the offensive once the Democratic nominee emerged, but with these other things happening, the sooner the better."

Republicans involved with the Bush-Cheney campaign said the appearance on "Meet the Press" marked the start of a more aggressive phase of the campaign. The campaign's strategists are making final decisions on the shape and timing of an advertising campaign that will probably go on the air within weeks, Republican officials said.

Campaign officials said Mr. Bush's appearance on "Meet the Press" was not a sign of panic or of any change in basic strategy.

"We're 269 days from the election, and that's several political lifetimes," said Terry Holt, the Bush campaign's spokesman. "If you've heard anything from the Bush campaign over the past 10 months, it's been that we expect a close race, and that's still operative."

February 7, 2004 Copyright © 2004 The New York Times Company.

17 posted on 02/07/2004 2:55:49 PM PST by evad (There is only one Brit Hume)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: evad
From Thomas Lifton;

"By reputation, the President was a very avid and skillful poker player when he was an MBA student. One of the secrets of a successful poker player is to encourage your opponent to bet a lot of chips on a losing hand. This is a pattern of behavior one sees repeatedly in George W. Bush’s political career. He is not one to loudly proclaim his strengths at the beginning of a campaign. Instead, he bides his time, does not respond forcefully, a least at first, to critiques from his enemies, no matter how loud and annoying they get. If anything, this apparent passivity only goads them into making their case more emphatically."

Well apparently, The White House decided to play some cards.

Good Luck, George.

18 posted on 02/07/2004 2:55:58 PM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Some of us have cojones and are not afraid to post the entire article.

Some of us think with our cajones instead of being courteous.

19 posted on 02/07/2004 2:57:13 PM PST by evad (There is only one Brit Hume)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: StatesEnemy
The Demonrats frame the debate as they choose. Bush has been trying to change that for many months to no avail.
20 posted on 02/07/2004 2:58:08 PM PST by luvbach1 (In the know on the border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson