Replies

In case you forget, man is part of nature, and has the right of survival far more than any other species. It is man who will take care of this problem, a needless one if government had let nature (progress and man) take it's course.

Progress and the fulfillment of man's destiny, two things that you obviously are against. So, turn off your computer, turn off your electricity, light your candles, grow your own food (because I'm certain you're a vegan), build your own house (if you can bear to cut down some poor trees), travel everywhere via horse/buggy, take no medication, and return to the simple life you, and Al Gore, yearn for, because you are right, capitalism and corporate greed are evil and ruining the world.

Oh, yeah, listen for that wolf howling in the night...and the blast of the gunshot that renders it's pelt to a place in front of a fireplace.

No need to further discuss this with you, as previous posts indicate your anti-progress/civilization stance and your insistence to always get the last word.
Goodbye!

You didn't answer these questions:

So are you saying that you will break the law? Do you feel that you are above the law? Are you saying that you will do whatever you please because you don't like a decision that the feds made?

Nor did you say whether you are now changing your mind about Nature. You have said that Nature cannot balance things that Nature *can* balance things. Which is it?

Nor have you apologized for saying that the author of the quote was not a government hack.

Nothing that you have said about me is true. Does it bother you at all to be so dishonest? Are you not only above the law but also above morality and personal character. I am probably far more supportive of progress than you are. But I do not define progress as having no wolves or bears or cougars or whales or dolphins or whatever else you want to exterminate. As to man's destiny. I'm sure that we do not agree about that. I believe that man creates his own destiny. What do you believe?

You wrote a post to me saying that you could hardly wait to hear my reaction to this thread. It was you, not me, that started this. But I assume that you are dropping out because you have lost the argument and cannot even decide whether you think Nature will or will not balance things out :-)

I have no problem with people shooting wolves that come onto their property. But don't you think that people should eat what they kill? I have a real problem with the extreme right wingers who think that they can kill anything they don't like -- just because they don't like it.