Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Azzurri
Re: Nazi comparison.

It also has this line which I think is interesting:

Still, scientists warn about drawing conclusions about humans. "For some people, what animals do is a yardstick of what is and isn't natural," Mr. Vasey said. "They make a leap from saying if it's natural, it's morally and ethically desirable."

But he added: "Infanticide is widespread in the animal kingdom. To jump from that to say it is desirable makes no sense. We shouldn't be using animals to craft moral and social policies for the kinds of human societies we want to live in. Animals don't take care of the elderly. I don't particularly think that should be a platform for closing down nursing homes."
71 posted on 02/07/2004 5:33:28 PM PST by optik_b (follow the money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: optik_b
My question in all of this is if homosexuallity is genetic, then why didn't natural selection take it out of the gene pool long ago?
78 posted on 02/07/2004 7:25:03 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Proud member of the right wing extremist Neanderthals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson