Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
Discretionary, non-DOD spending as a percentage of GDP for Reagan's first two years was 3.9% and and 3.8%. For Bush, for his first two years, it was 3.5% and 3.6%.

Since this is not a contradiction of my final reply...

The above has been my point from my first post. It contradicted your CATO chart. But since it is not a contradiction to your last reply, then logically you agree with my first post.

578 posted on 02/06/2004 5:18:51 PM PST by FreeReign (Anno regni)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
Sure I agree with that. I will repeat again the following which is the last I have to say on the matter:

1) Reagan inherited a much higher level of nondefense discretionary spending as percentage of GDP than did Bush (4.5% versus 3.2% ... 40% higher).

2) Reagan immediately cut nondefense discretionary spending as percentage of GDP by 4% in his very first budget, and slashed it by 22% in his first term. Bush immediately hiked nondefense discretionary spending by 9% in his very first budget, and by 26%+ in his first term.

3) You ignore the third and fourth budgets when the nondefense discretionary spending of Reagan's first term fell to 3.5% of GDP in both budgets. Nondefense discretionary spending as percentage of GDP increased to 3.9% and then to 4.1% under Bush's budgets (the latter figure will be higher).

4) You are becoming ridiculous. Please leave me alone.
581 posted on 02/06/2004 5:33:58 PM PST by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson