Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeReign
Took me a bit to find the figures. Total federal spending under Bush's current budget policy is about 20.2% of GDP versus a 22.3% average under Reagan. Of that, non-military discretionary spending accounted for 17.1% of Reagan's budgets and accounts for at least 19.4% of Bush's budgets. That means that Reagan's non-military discretionary spending as a percent of GDP checked in at about 3.81% whereas Bush's checks in at 3.88%.

Moreover, none of that was at Reagan's sole discretion since every spending bill passed and signed during his term had to be introduced by a Democratic House.

445 posted on 02/06/2004 1:03:49 PM PST by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv; FreeReign
Correction: That should be 3.92% of national GDP for GWB's non-military discretionary spending (versus 3.81% under Reagan).
450 posted on 02/06/2004 1:07:14 PM PST by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
Moreover, none of that was at Reagan's sole discretion since every spending bill passed and signed during his term had to be introduced by a Democratic House.

The president at his own discretion submits the budget to the House through the OMB. The president at his own discretion signs the budget after congress sign it.

The Congress can't rewrite what is submitted. The congress can refuse to sign the appropriations.

Reagan submitted and signed those federal budget

505 posted on 02/06/2004 2:25:09 PM PST by FreeReign (Anno regni)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson