[hchutch]

When one is advicating action that are directly at odds with their screen name, I think I have reason to question how thoughtful you really are.

Your actions are objectively pro-Kerry. It is no different in my book than what John Warner did to Ollie North here in Virginia, back in 1994. Warner's actions were objectively pro-Robb.

I'm just willing to call the "stay at home" and "third party" people (which you are one of) what they are to any objective observer. The truth hurts, doesn't it?

[Bikers4Bush]

"When one is advicating action that are directly at odds with their screen name, I think I have reason to
question how thoughtful you really are."

There was a time when I felt he deserved my support and now I don't feel the same. What you should be questioning is why the President feels that he can abandon the party and it's principles not what my screename is.

My actions are pro-conservative regardless of what you call them.

The truth doesn't hurt me at all, especially since it can set one free.

Name calling by you or anyone else is irrelevant and only proves the weakness of your position.