[NittanyLion]

I don't like it, and I'm not going to tolerate it. Nor am I going to bother with niceties. His advocacy of Tancredo is objectively pro-Kerry. So, why should I treat him any better than I would treat a Kerry supporter?

By all means, continue. Childishness of the sort you describe stands in stark contrast to those of us trying to debate substance; indeed it only bolsters our case.

[hchutch]

If someone's actions are objectively supporting John Kerry, why shouldn't it be pointed out? Why is that causing such distress? Why are you unwilling to address the conseuqences of your actions, and instead prefer to hide behind the claim that I am being "childish"?

If you want childish, look at John Warner's actions in 1994 after Ollie North won the nomination to oppose Charles Robb for a Senate seat.