To: jimt
What will be discrimination, assuming the homosexuals get their way, is any restrictions other than age on who gets to be marriage partners.Why stop at age? It's all relative. /sarcasm
27 posted on
02/05/2004 11:59:26 AM PST by
angkor
To: angkor
Why stop at age? It's all relative. /sarcasm Because most people naturally recoil at children being treated as adults, but lots wouldn't care if some numbskull wanted to "marry" a rock.
Also, because it's a convenient spot to use to pick apart the homosexuals' ridiculous "discrimination" ploy.
31 posted on
02/05/2004 12:39:15 PM PST by
jimt
To: angkor
This is what the left is always about
feeeeeeeeeelings. (hello Rush?!)
Listen to Barney frank or the HRC or any other homosexual group. When two homosexuals feeeeeeeeeeeeel love then they should be married. It is not about standards, it is not about any right or wrong just feeeeeeeeeelings.
Marriage has three requirements
1. Age of consent
2. Not closer related than first cousin
3. One exclusive male one exclusiv female (a breeding pair)
You could add not still married to another but the exclusive takes care of that.
Homosexuasl want to remove all of the above and repace the only criteria with feeeeeeeeeeeelings.
Same leftist liberal cr*p they have been spouting from day 1 of the commie revolution. No profiles at security points because it hurts feeeeeeeeelings. No grades in school because feeeeeeeelings are going to be hurt. No scoring at children's games because feeeeeeelings will be hurt. Words are prohibited because the make people feeeeeeel bad.
If nothing else the lefts is consistently ridiculous.
at least that is how I feeeeeeeeel.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson