Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mfx007
I guess child custody is the big thing that needs to be adressed.

The system I've proposed (no state involvement in marriage) wouldn't change how we currently look at child custody. Courts charged with dealing with child custody would continue to handle those issues based on current laws. The status of marriage between the various consenting adults involved would in no way affect the power of such courts to rule in the best interests of the children involved.

Now, whether or not our current child custody regime needs to be changed, I leave to those who know more about the subject than I do.

74 posted on 02/05/2004 12:09:24 PM PST by Modernman ("The details of my life are quite inconsequential...." - Dr. Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Modernman
The status of marriage between the various consenting adults involved would in no way affect the power of such courts to rule in the best interests of the children involved.

Now, whether or not our current child custody regime needs to be changed, I leave to those who know more about the subject than I do.

Children are what the industry uses to control parents. Any change in the system that doesn't curtail that power will do nothing to solve the problems with marriage. You may as well do nothing if that isn't part of it.

77 posted on 02/05/2004 12:30:13 PM PST by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson