Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
Another question then: what is the need for marriage?

I would say, historically, they served for one of two reasons:

1) To tie two families together and thereby increase the political or material assets of the families;

2) To establish a clear way for property to be passed down from generation to generation. Theoretically, all sons borne in wedlock were fathered by the husband.

Today, I think those two reasons don't really apply. Marriage serves as a form of social stability. Married couples are able to pool their various resources to improve their lives and the lives of their children.

42 posted on 02/05/2004 9:44:25 AM PST by Modernman ("The details of my life are quite inconsequential...." - Dr. Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Modernman
Good points. There would be more than one way to administer such institutions. For example, in America a system of patriarchy was superimposed over an existing system of matriarchy when the Euros arrived. The matriarchy still exists although it is not recognized by the state.
44 posted on 02/05/2004 9:51:19 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Modernman
Another question then: what is the need for marriage?

Preserve mankind from evil and degeneracy.

60 posted on 02/05/2004 11:12:37 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson