Skip to comments.
DISNEY HEIR ZINGS EISNER, PUSHES FOR HIS MOUSTER (Roy cites cultural decay)
NY POST ^
| February 5, 2004
| PAUL THARP
Posted on 02/05/2004 5:52:36 AM PST by Liz
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:19:27 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Citing "Disney's cultural decay," Roy Disney is escalating his battle to boot Michael Eisner from the Walt Disney board for squandering $25 billion on a series of flops.
Roy Disney, 74, nephew of the studio's legendary founder, formally opened his campaign Tuesday to get institutional investors to reject Eisner's re-election to the board.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: disney; eisner; roydisney
Roy Disney, one of the largest shareholders with about 17.3 million shares, left the board last year after it forced an age requirement on him. Gold also resigned from the board. The insurgents also claim that any director who has disagreed with Eisner's rule has been forced off the board and that there is no separation of Eisner's roles as chairman and CEO. The group said there were also "serious governance deficiencies" and a lack of board independence. For example, the company's "succession plan" consists of a sealed envelope to be opened in the event of Eisner's death.
1
posted on
02/05/2004 5:52:37 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
Conteporary Disney has little of the imagination, creativity, and magic that Walt gave to it.
2
posted on
02/05/2004 5:59:54 AM PST
by
Savage Beast
(Whom will the terrorists vote for? Not George W. Bush--that's for sure! ~Happy2BMe)
To: Liz
I certainly agree that there is cultural decay, and I'm sure Roy Disney agrees. But his appeal to the shareholders is basically financial. Eisner has run the company badly, wasted and misinvested money, and driven out talent.
He doesn't dare say much about cultural decay, or they'll use it against him, claiming that he's just an old fogey conservative.
3
posted on
02/05/2004 6:02:07 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Liz
"Mouster." Guffaw.
4
posted on
02/05/2004 6:04:20 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(Chat is my milieu)
To: Liz
Eisner's leadership has not only lead to finacial reversals for Disney it has also turned Mickey Mouse into a sewer rat.
To: Liz
"its breakup with hit factory Pixar Animation Studios."
I could not believe that Disney would have let this happen, considering the fact that they were the ones to produce hits. Disney did not want the deal Pixar was asking for because Disney would have gotten less money, well they ended up loosing Pixar and any money they would have gotten from the movies. Kinda like pointing a gun at your head because you don't want to shoot yourself in the foot.
6
posted on
02/05/2004 6:13:04 AM PST
by
looscnnn
(Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
To: The Great RJ
Mickey Rat--hm, just had a vision of Minnie Mouse flashing her boob in public...wonder why Eisner didn't think of that before Janet?
Would be a funny photoshop moment.
7
posted on
02/05/2004 6:50:48 AM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: martin_fierro
The Post gets carried away sometimes (snicker).
8
posted on
02/05/2004 7:10:22 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
Eisner deserves to be Mousted for sure. Then Clinton will tell him to put some Mice on it.
9
posted on
02/05/2004 8:26:18 AM PST
by
kylaka
(The Clintons are the democRATS crack cocaine. They know he's bad for them, they just can't stop.)
To: looscnnn
I could not believe that Disney would have let this happen, considering the fact that they were the ones to produce hits. Disney did not want the deal Pixar was asking for because Disney would have gotten less money, well they ended up loosing Pixar and any money they would have gotten from the movies. Kinda like pointing a gun at your head because you don't want to shoot yourself in the foot.What's scary is that Disney gets to keep the rights to produce sequals to the Pixar features. Disney notoriously produces sub-standard, stupid direct-to-video crap, including "Cinderella 2," "The Little Mermaid," "Lilo and Stitch 2," and so on. I'd hate to see the wonderful "Toy Story" franchise degrade into the swamp known as "The Land Before Time, 12,985 - Little Foot's Evolutionary Dead Ends."
10
posted on
02/05/2004 8:32:07 AM PST
by
Kieri
(Who's waiting for the return of her beloved Farscape!)
To: The Great RJ
Exactly.
11
posted on
02/05/2004 8:35:48 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: Kieri
"What's scary is that Disney gets to keep the rights to produce sequals to the Pixar features. Disney notoriously produces sub-standard, stupid direct-to-video crap, including "Cinderella 2," "The Little Mermaid," "Lilo and Stitch 2," and so on. I'd hate to see the wonderful "Toy Story" franchise degrade into the swamp known as "The Land Before Time, 12,985 - Little Foot's Evolutionary Dead Ends.""
I think that things could be patched up between them if Eisner is booted. If they can't get back together, then I fear Disney will feel some serious pain. They closed their FL animation studio, that really cramps their ability to produce products. If it was closed due to the quality of product, they should have just cleared out the talent and hired new. Only time will tell what happens.
12
posted on
02/05/2004 9:03:07 AM PST
by
looscnnn
(Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
To: Kieri
Disney notoriously produces sub-standard, stupid direct-to-video crap, including "Cinderella 2," "The Little Mermaid," "Lilo and Stitch 2," and so on.Those films, known around acronym-loving Disney as DVPs (Direct Video Premieres) are a cash cow for the company, the only bright spot in their in-house animation slate. They cost very little because they offshore the vast majority of the animation to Korea or someplace else, and parents will apparently buy anything that has the original characters in it. That's why the former head of that unit, David Stainton, was named the new head of Feature Animation when Tom Schumacher was given the boot.
13
posted on
02/05/2004 9:23:47 AM PST
by
Heyworth
To: Liz; All
So who will replace eisner?
To: longtermmemmory
Pixar's Jobs and Bob Eiger's names are being mentioned.
15
posted on
02/05/2004 10:40:29 AM PST
by
Liz
To: kylaka
Cute.
16
posted on
02/05/2004 10:44:01 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
Pixar's Jobs and Bob Eiger's names are being mentioned. Jobs would be an unlikely choice. He's still basically a tech guy, and between running Apple and Pixar (where he's pretty hands off--John Lasseter is the real genius there), his plate is full. What I don't discount is that he might work with Roy to engineer Eisner's ouster. As for Bob Iger, he's actually the guy that Eisner points to as his heir apparent. This is widely considered to be his way of ensuring that he won't be booted, because Iger isn't even liked by the people on the board loyal to Eisner. And given Iger's track record of running ABC and the rest of Disney's TV operation, he's seen as an utter failure. Personally, I think they'd make the offer to Joe Roth, who used to be the Chairman of the Disney Studios (the moviemaking part of the company), until Eisner drove him out in 2000.
17
posted on
02/05/2004 11:02:34 AM PST
by
Heyworth
To: Liz
18
posted on
02/05/2004 11:28:18 AM PST
by
VxH
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson