To: Liz
Thus far the broadcast responses from Timberlake, and
Jackson, and the rest is not at all unlike the "didn't know
the gun was loaded" defence. These two spoiled actors
planned and executed this shock and awe. And their aw shucks defence is B.S.The promoters and the network have no
legitimate defence in the chanel changer excuse--because
they were complicit with the acts,and negligent,and those
present at the game who had children there who had every right to expect the Superbowl to be about entertainment and
football-- NOT bathhouse humor and SEX were denied that option.
To: StonyBurk
You are correct. The actual "breast" incident doesn't bother me as much as the constant suggestive dancing and innuendo in shows that are supposed to be family entertainment. I don't take my three kids to topless bars or brothels and I certainly don't expect them to be exposed to vulgar behavior in virtually every venue.
The language used in these "family hour" presentations just keeps scraping the bottom of the barrel as well. I used to think that parents that wouldn't let their kids watch television were "wierd". Now I'm leaning their way.
74 posted on
02/05/2004 10:37:59 AM PST by
JayNorth
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson