To: kattracks
If Bush backpedals on his invasion of Iraq - its all over. He's finished.
There were solid reasons for our involvement there beyond WMD and the jury is still out on those.
As ALWAYS, the Democrats are behaving exactly as what they are - mendacious, self-serving traitors.
7 posted on
02/05/2004 4:28:48 AM PST by
ZULU
(GOD BLESS SENATOR JOE MCCARTHY!!!)
To: ZULU
He won't backpedal on the invasion. He'll start doing what he should have done earlier-- laying out intelligence supporting each side of the WMD argument and saying why he agreed with one side and not the other (like his stem cell decision). He'll also talk about the other non-WMD reasons for the invasion. Tim will ask him why did the invasion have to begin in March 2003. I don't know what Bush's response will be.
10 posted on
02/05/2004 4:36:49 AM PST by
GraniteStateConservative
("You can dip a pecan in gold, but it's still a pecan"-- Deep Thoughts by JC Watts)
To: ZULU
The 'non-biased' media are trying today to cast clouds over President Bush for not informing the Washington intelligentia that a ricin-laced letter had been sent to the White House last fall. These 'non-partisan' reporters are claiming that W was derelict, in unnecessarily risking the lives of, presumably, the Washington press corps.
14 posted on
02/05/2004 6:05:54 AM PST by
maica
(Mainstream America Is Conservative America)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson