[goldstategop]

Joe Farah's view is the President deserves to lose his bid for re-election cause he betrayed his supporters on spending. He has the same view about Arnold, the California Governor who is now backing a new bill granting illegal aliens drivers' licenses despite the fact 70% of California voters are opposed. The reason we don't have limited constitutional government in this country is we don't elect people to public office who will uphold the principle or rather we expect politicians all of our problems. So from the opposite end of the argument, we gain nothing by keeping spineless politicians in office. If we want a return to the kind of government we used to have, we'd better stop wasting our votes on bad choices.

[nopardons]

And just WHEN was that " we used to have " time?

} Joe's been angry with the president, over some law suit or other, for years. His anti-Bush rants are an emotional vendetta.

[little jeremiah]

I disagree with Farah on this one. (About Bush. Arnold is another matter...) So Bush spends too much - it makes me gag that spending is increasing for the NEA! But who else is there to vote for? What good will it do to sit out the election, or vote for some mythical Constitution Party candidate? That only insures a rabid mentally ill lunatic leftist in the White House.

Sure, it would be great if I or another Freeper who is truly conservative could get elected, but it won't happen.

In fact, Farah's attitude is what makes me not want to go to his website any more.