To: XBob; FairOpinion; edger
If FairOpinion's graph from the CBO is correct, and XBob's table of debt figures is correct, that means we borrowed money even when we were taking in more than we were spending. Maybe someone could explain in more detail how this "Enron-style accounting" worked. Hopefully they didn't count the money we borrowed as income.
To: wideminded
I think it may have to do with all the "off budget" spending that "technically" doesn't show up in the deficit.
21 posted on
02/04/2004 7:39:57 PM PST by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: wideminded; FairOpinion; edger; BamaBlue
16 - "Maybe someone could explain in more detail how this "Enron-style accounting" worked. Hopefully they didn't count the money we borrowed as income."
That's exactly what they did.
Except that as the 'negotiable treasury bonds' expired, they borrowed the money from the Social Security surplus, and replaced them with non-negotiable 'IOU's.
50 posted on
02/05/2004 11:56:39 AM PST by
XBob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson