Skip to comments.
Sub repairs will total $9.4 million [USS Hartford]
Navy Times ^
| February 04, 2004
| Christopher Munsey
Posted on 02/04/2004 2:51:08 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Edited on 05/07/2004 10:11:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Repairing the damaged attack submarine Hartford will cost about $9.4 million, Navy officials said. Hartford briefly scraped bottom while cruising on the surface Oct. 25 near La Maddalena, Italy. The submarine suffered damage to its rudder and scrapes on its hull and lost acoustical tiles.
(Excerpt) Read more at navytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hartford; oops; submarine; usshartford
This sounds worse than just a little bottom scrape.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; Pan_Yan
Just cosmetic, I'm sure. :)
2
posted on
02/04/2004 2:52:55 PM PST
by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Say not, 'I have found the truth,' but rather, 'I have found a truth.'--- Kahlil Gibran)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
If the "acoustic tiles" were really hull array hydrophones, that would account for the large price tag.
3
posted on
02/04/2004 2:56:22 PM PST
by
j_tull
To: j_tull
guess the skipper can kiss his career goodbye.
4
posted on
02/04/2004 2:57:39 PM PST
by
OldCorps
To: OldCorps
Yeah, have they named the new skipper...
5
posted on
02/04/2004 3:07:18 PM PST
by
Taylor42
To: OldCorps
Any bubbleheads onboard? Where was the boat when it "scraped" bottom while running on the surface? I know of a place in Washington (by way of a documentory) where sibs must run on the surface to avoid hitting the bottom as they deploy to sea. I thought the draft of an SSN (city name) was less than a SSBN (state name).
6
posted on
02/04/2004 3:08:23 PM PST
by
PokeyJoe
(This tagline got outsourced to India.)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Probably involves a lot of rewelding...and every separate weld would have to go through SUBSAFE certification. The cost of redoing the SUBSAFE cert is nontrivial.
7
posted on
02/04/2004 3:08:46 PM PST
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I would have gotten a second estimate before approving the repairs.
8
posted on
02/04/2004 3:17:12 PM PST
by
spiffy
To: OldCorps
Oh yes. The CO wasn't the only officer relieved of duty over this incident.
9
posted on
02/04/2004 3:17:51 PM PST
by
Excuse_My_Bellicosity
(If universities didn't teach worthless subjects, who would?)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I'd hate to serve on that thing. Probably use it in the future for an underwater noise generator.
10
posted on
02/04/2004 3:20:31 PM PST
by
fso301
To: OldCorps
Capt.s have to sleep sometimes and during this time someone else may have been at the helm and navigation. While ultimately responsible for everything that happens on or to his ship I'd like to hear more detail before convicting a capt.
I have always had either motor or sailboats and have upon occation hit bottom evan though i seriously study charts.
11
posted on
02/04/2004 3:22:42 PM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(G.W. Bush in 2004)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Unless the "bottom" referred to was a russian sub.
To: DainBramage
13
posted on
02/04/2004 3:41:18 PM PST
by
Jambe
To: j_tull
The accoustic tiles are the rubber coatings that cover the whole hull. They are a pain in the a## to attach and come off all the time. You can go out to sea for five minutes and lose twenty tiles. I'm sure they lost some hull hydrophones as well. If they banged up the rudder, they probably dinged the prop as well (not cheap). The 'outboard motor' drops out of the hull right before the rudder and it might have needed some realignment as well.
14
posted on
02/04/2004 6:06:44 PM PST
by
Pan_Yan
(John Adams is doing about a thousand RPMs)
To: Joe Boucher
I understand how the Navy demands that some person (usually the Captain) takes the blame, no matter what happens.
You know, sometimes Sh*t Happens!
I would much rather learn the lessons and keep an experienced Captain around, than destroy his reputation and waste all the time and money invested in him over the years.
This policy of the Navy is something that I have never understood.
Yes, if the Captain gave a direct order that resulted in the damage to the Submarine, then he should be held accountable for his actions.
15
posted on
02/04/2004 6:14:53 PM PST
by
Hunble
To: Hunble
Yes, if the Captain gave a direct order that resulted in the damage to the Submarine, then he should be held accountable for his actions.He approved putting a complete f***ing moron on watch as the OOD.
It's not difficult to avoid running aground at La Maddelena. You just stay in the middle of the blue stuff (water), and stay away from the brown stuff (ground).
16
posted on
02/04/2004 9:10:29 PM PST
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson