[Gunslingr3]

"We know there is no supernatural, because it does not show up on instruments. Interesting to find the refutation of an argument right in the middle of the argument ...

Interesting because you made it up?

Science endevours to understand and explain, by virtue of logic and confirmable, repeatable experimentation. But every scientists realizes 100 successful experiments doesn't prove him right, and one unsuccessful can prove him wrong.

I'll take an effort like that over "We know there is a supernatural, because it was written about in a book and told to us by a guy who wanted 10% of what we earned."

[MHGinTN]

My my, you certainly went out of your way to make a spectacle of yourself! Hooray for you ... the meaning of the word 'supernatural' as used colloquially is the key to my comment you quoted. I won't bore you with any further comments ... your intellect is obviously far superior to any here at FR, in your opinion.

[MHGinTN]

I didn't make up the comment you can read for yourself in post #2.

[Woahhs]

But every scientists realizes 100 successful experiments doesn't prove him right, and one unsuccessful can prove him wrong.

What a crock!

Tell it to Rhoemer, Semelweiss, Planck, or Thomas Kuhn.

[Taliesan]

We know there is a supernatural, because it was written about in a book and told to us by a guy who wanted 10% of what we earned.

And he wanted that 10% so bad he died in order to get it.

Ah, the majesty of a scientific mind. It sheds the light of logic on the mysteries of the ages.