Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: visualops
""Some" for straights, is actually "most", and "some" for gays is just that, "some". The gay long-term relationships (for gay men) are also less likely to be monogamous."

Sounds likely from anecdotal evidence, but this study sure didn't show it, and we don't really know the magnitude of the difference or the reason for it.

"Well, you restated what I said (long-term relationships constitute the majority of adult male-female relationships). In 2002, 52% of all people over the age of 15 were married. "

I didn't restate what you said -- I said something else that was more accurate. You could do the same thing by inserting the word "current" into your quote above, between the words "of" and "adult." It's a subtle difference, but a meaningful one. You can get statistics to say anything you want, depending on how you report them (as evidenced by the cited study).

"A woman dates, let's say, 6 different men in the span of time from high school til age 26. Those relationships could be a few dates, or a couple of years courtship. Anyway, guy number six hangs in there, and they get married. They stay married (and eventualy die).
So, duh, she's had more short term relationships than long term."

For purposes of critiquing this study, though, let's say that she's of an average age when the study took place -- perhaps 40. Let's say that her first four relationships lasted 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and a year. Her marriage is 14 years long at the time of the study. That makes her average RELATIONSHIP 2.75 years long, or not so very different from the average relationship of those gay people in the study. This is why it makes no sense to compare "relationships" to "marriages" in such a study. The research on this issue is pretty low quality.
583 posted on 02/08/2004 12:28:56 PM PST by Kahonek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies ]


To: Kahonek
For purposes of critiquing this study, though, let's say that she's of an average age when the study took place -- perhaps 40. Let's say that her first four relationships lasted 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and a year. Her marriage is 14 years long at the time of the study. That makes her average RELATIONSHIP 2.75 years long, or not so very different from the average relationship of those gay people in the study. This is why it makes no sense to compare "relationships" to "marriages" in such a study. The research on this issue is pretty low quality.

It is absurb to take a few short relationships, and one very long one, and say that compares with a lifetime of short relationships.
Fact is, long term gay relationships are not common, or they'd have no problem providing examples, as the gay community itself would be an example.
585 posted on 02/08/2004 2:00:55 PM PST by visualops (I'm still trying to figure out why kamikaze pilots wore helmets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson